ReplacesMicrosoft CopilotChatGPT Enterprisegeneric AI bolt-ons
Copilot
vs the generic AI assistant
An AI assistant that answers over YOUR operation, not the open web. It is grounded in your own tenant data behind row-level isolation, capped by a hard per-tenant cost ceiling, and every answer is logged and costed — an assistant that cannot spend without limit or leak across tenants.
Why it wins
- Grounded in your tenant data behind row-level security — never another tenant
- Hard per-tenant cost ceiling (not a soft alert): it stops at 100%
- Every call logged with prompt, response, tokens, cost and trace context
- UK data residency; your data is not used to train a shared model
How it compares
Measured on publicly available data against the named market leader(s) it replaces. Every row links its source.
| IMAISA | The market leader | |
|---|---|---|
| Grounding | Answers grounded in your own RLS-isolated operational data | General-purpose assistant; grounding in your FM data is not the productsource for the Grounding comparison |
| Cost control | Hard per-tenant ceiling — the assistant halts at the limit | Per-seat subscription; no per-tenant AI cost-ceiling control publishedsource for the Cost control comparison |
| Data residency | UK eu-west-2 (London); your data is not used to train a shared model | Global cloud; UK-default residency not committed on standard planssource for the Data residency comparison |
RLSgrounded in your tenant only
£hard per-tenant cost ceiling
Loggedevery call costed + traced
UKeu-west-2 residency
Engineered across 2 architecture decision records (0126, 0216) — a deliberately-built module, not a checkbox.