ReplacesMRI EvolutionConcept EvolutionService Geeni
Scheduling & Dispatch
vs the legacy CAFM scheduler
Planned and reactive work in one audited record. PPM recurrence is standards-based (RFC-5545 RRULE), assignment is skills- and cert-aware, and the SLA clock is measured per work order on a UK-holiday-aware calendar.
Why it wins
- RFC-5545 RRULE recurrence — real calendar-standard PPM, not bespoke repeat rules
- Skills- and cert-aware automatic assignment
- Application-layer SLA clocks (Europe/London, bank-holiday aware) per work order
- Reactive + planned maintenance in one tenant-scoped, audited record
How it compares
Measured on publicly available data against the named market leader(s) it replaces. Every row links its source.
| IMAISA | The market leader | |
|---|---|---|
| PPM recurrence | RFC-5545 RRULE — the iCalendar recurrence standard | PPM scheduling with an SFG20 integration (no published standards-based engine)source for the PPM recurrence comparison |
| Assignment | Skills- and cert-aware auto-assignment | Reactive job assignment against an asset registersource for the Assignment comparison |
| Pricing transparency | Bundled in the platform — no per-module upsell for scheduling | Quote-only; no public pricing for the CAFM schedulersource for the Pricing transparency comparison |
